Darryl Yap is to face a complaint filed by Vic Sotto after his name was mentioned in his movie.
Director Darryl Yap is facing a legal complaint from veteran comedian and actor Vic Sotto over the use of his name in an upcoming film. The controversy erupted after a teaser for Yap’s “Pepsi Paloma” movie directly referenced Sotto, prompting the comedian to pursue legal recourse.
Pepsi Paloma, born Delia Duenas Smith, was a well-known actress whose untimely death by suicide remains shrouded in mystery. Paloma’s life became the subject of widespread attention following allegations involving Sotto, Joey de Leon, and Richie D’Horsie. The accusations suggested serious misconduct, and the incident has remained a controversial topic long after her passing.
In a move that has amplified public interest, Yap chose to revisit this sensitive topic through his latest film. While the project has already garnered significant online attention, the teaser trailer stirred further debate by explicitly mentioning Sotto’s name. This direct reference led to speculation and backlash, with many expressing surprise at the bold inclusion.
Reports indicate that Sotto plans to officially file his complaint on January 9 at the Muntinlupa City Regional Trial Court. His legal team confirmed the action, citing a specific scene in the film where actress Charito Solis (portrayed by Gina Alajar) questions Paloma (played by Rhed Bustamante) about Sotto’s involvement. Paloma’s on-screen response, a firm “Oo!” (Yes), forms the crux of Sotto’s grievance.
Yap, known for tackling provocative subjects in his films, defended his artistic vision. He emphasized that the film offers what he describes as “shocking and truthful revelations.” Yap also clarified that the project is independent, not affiliated with TAPE Inc., and is not backed by any anti-Sotto entities.
As this legal battle unfolds, the film continues to spark curiosity and debate among viewers. What are your thoughts on this developing story? Share your opinions in the comments below!
Disclaimer 🚫
This article is based on publicly available information and current discussions. The details concerning the Pepsi Paloma controversy are part of historical records and ongoing public discourse. As new insights or perspectives emerge, the narrative may evolve. Readers are encouraged to engage with the topic thoughtfully and sensitively.
Chika Tayo does not endorse or take sides regarding the views, claims, or actions referenced in this content. It is essential to recognize that public figures, including those involved, have rights to privacy and fair representation. As responsible consumers of online information, let us strive to foster a culture of respect, mindful engagement, and accountability. Spreading unverified or harmful content can have lasting consequences—let dignity and empathy guide our conversations.
